Swampyville - The (Unradicalized) Supreme Court Decision on "ObamaCare"!
by Swamptown
 Swampyville's - You're the Poet!
Apr 05, 2012 | 950 views | 0 0 comments | 25 25 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink
Swampyville - Reading Between the Lines!

The (unradicalized?) Supreme Courts decision on "ObamaCare"!

RADICALIZE (In this case): "To make rapid and sweeping changes in

                            laws and methods of Government"!

Yahoo! News (April 2, 2012)

"President Obama on Monday issued stearn (threatening)

language to the Supreme Court regarding his health care,

expressing confidence "ObamaCare" will not be overturned.

He said, that overturning the (Government/Special Interests)

law would be "an unprecedented and extraordinary step" and

compared the court's rejection (all or parts) of the law

to be "Judicial Activism". For years what we have heard is the

biggest problem on the bench was "Judicial Activism", he said.

The president stressed that the judges are "unelected"

and noted the law was passed by a democratically elected

(stacked deck) Congress"!

(Reflecting back on "Judicial Activism" in the past, it was

mainly Democratic Presidents/Administrations that attemped

to radicalize previous Supreme Courts.  Even the Republicans,

at times, have been guilty of trying to "Stack" the Supreme

Court "deck of cards".)

(It's "Judicial Activism" only when the powers that are

(Government/Special Interests) can't get the Supreme Court

to "go along to get along".  When the court doesn't play by

their (both parties) rules of the game, they will take their

equipment "Supreme Court budget appropriations (Government) and

political campaign contributions (Special Interests)", and go home.)

(The politicians knew when "ObamaCare" was passed that it

wouldn't stand on it's own merit. They knew that it would be

challenged by the people and they too counted on "Judicial

Activism" to declare it, "Obamacare", to be Constitutional.

(Thus, further weakening the U.S. Constitution.)

(In my opinion, the Supreme Court "may" rule the "Individual

heath care mandate" as being unconstitutional and let the

remainder of the law stand. If the Supreme Court decides

in favor of the entire "ObamaCare" law, that will mean the

end of the U.S. Constitution, as we know it.)

(What the President and many in Congress fail (or don't want to

understand) is that the primary reason for the Supreme Court is to

uphold  the U.S. Constitution; and not to radicalize its meaning

whenever it will benefit the Government/Special Interests!)

(The above have all swarn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and

not to "whimsically" change it whenever they feel it will fulfill their

Agenda.)

EVIDENTLY, THE "CHECKS AND BALANCES" THAT THE FRAMERS PLACED IN THE

U.S. CONSTITUTION NO LONGER HAS ANY "REDEEMING VALUE" IN THEIR NEW

"PROGRESSIVE" ONE WORLD ORDER!

COME ON PEOPLE, WHEN ARE YOU EVER GOING TO CONCLUDE AND WAKE

UP TO THE FACT THAT THIS COUNTRY HAS NEVER BEEN CONTROLLED BY

THE PEOPLE!  IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN CONTROLLED BY THE "SPECIAL

INTERESTS"!  WE THE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO BE PAWNS IN THE "SPECIAL

INTERESTS" GAME OF "INTERNATIONAL CHESS"!

"PRAESIS UT PROSIS NE UT IMPERES"

(Lead in order to serve, not in order to rule)
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet