more comments...
« alisonmjames wrote on Tuesday, Oct 02 at 09:50 AM »
I thought this was a great article. Aside from a few minor errors, well done!
« di27407@gmail.com wrote on Thursday, Sep 27 at 06:25 PM »
Give Us More Lane Jones. Funny Stuff!
« thisguysucks wrote on Monday, Sep 24 at 02:43 AM »
Is your comment for real? First of all, let's count the places where you fail to keep it real. Your keeping it real ability was obviously in question from the get-go, as your username sucks. Schmeriously Dave? C'mon. Your next failure at being a decently cool person making positive contributions to your society came when you lambasted over the Web (anonymously, lolol) a writer for a column by talking about a lack of original reporting in the piece (?). It pretty clearly says HER VIEW at the top of the page you voluntarily clicked on so even if your Dickensian grasp of the Queen's language failed to alert you to the fact it is was an opinion piece upon reading the first - I don't know - 150 words, the title tries to hit you in the face and let you know it's a column so you don't flaunt your brief moments of idiocy online in the form of, again, hammering into a college writer. But, most importantly, your rush to be a condescending jackass probably doomed your points for most of your readers who even cared to read what a Mr. Schmave had to say anyway. Even if the thing was utterly ridiculous and unreadable, what do you get from telling people what to hang on their mother's fridge or what the lump in their pocket is? Frankly, I have too many gliterry cardboard and glue framed comments from Internet geniuses like yourself to make room on my mother's fridge for this piece and I can't post here what the lump in my pocket is but I assure you it doesn't interview people. In the way you meant. I'm tired of giving you more time than you deserve, but I'll end by using your commenting guidebook's chapter six outline on powerful and persuasive closings. You're probably an (hmm, I have no clue) embittered bastard who believes they're some poetic and well-versed linguistic idol, just waiting for that one comment that will get you that recognition you so achingly want and long for. So the fact that your writing is (hey look, I didn't have to change anything) immature is understandable. The Plainsman, on the other hand, should be embarrassed blah blah blah. (I didn't change that either because I don't get why people like you can have your posts like this left up online for so long.) While not technically anything constructive, overly original or worth any time at all, there is not a single thought here I would guess is capable of achieving anything. (And you just suck.)