Swampyville - Reading Between the Lines!
The (unradicalized?) Supreme Courts decision on "ObamaCare"!
RADICALIZE (In this case): "To make rapid and sweeping changes in
laws and methods of Government"!
Yahoo! News (April 2, 2012)
"President Obama on Monday issued stearn (threatening)
language to the Supreme Court regarding his health care,
expressing confidence "ObamaCare" will not be overturned.
He said, that overturning the (Government/Special Interests)
law would be "an unprecedented and extraordinary step" and
compared the court's rejection (all or parts) of the law
to be "Judicial Activism". For years what we have heard is the
biggest problem on the bench was "Judicial Activism", he said.
The president stressed that the judges are "unelected"
and noted the law was passed by a democratically elected
(stacked deck) Congress"!
(Reflecting back on "Judicial Activism" in the past, it was
mainly Democratic Presidents/Administrations that attemped
to radicalize previous Supreme Courts. Even the Republicans,
at times, have been guilty of trying to "Stack" the Supreme
Court "deck of cards".)
(It's "Judicial Activism" only when the powers that are
(Government/Special Interests) can't get the Supreme Court
to "go along to get along". When the court doesn't play by
their (both parties) rules of the game, they will take their
equipment "Supreme Court budget appropriations (Government) and
political campaign contributions (Special Interests)", and go home.)
(The politicians knew when "ObamaCare" was passed that it
wouldn't stand on it's own merit. They knew that it would be
challenged by the people and they too counted on "Judicial
Activism" to declare it, "Obamacare", to be Constitutional.
(Thus, further weakening the U.S. Constitution.)
(In my opinion, the Supreme Court "may" rule the "Individual
heath care mandate" as being unconstitutional and let the
remainder of the law stand. If the Supreme Court decides
in favor of the entire "ObamaCare" law, that will mean the
end of the U.S. Constitution, as we know it.)
(What the President and many in Congress fail (or don't want to
understand) is that the primary reason for the Supreme Court is to
uphold the U.S. Constitution; and not to radicalize its meaning
whenever it will benefit the Government/Special Interests!)
(The above have all swarn an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution and
not to "whimsically" change it whenever they feel it will fulfill their
EVIDENTLY, THE "CHECKS AND BALANCES" THAT THE FRAMERS PLACED IN THE
U.S. CONSTITUTION NO LONGER HAS ANY "REDEEMING VALUE" IN THEIR NEW
"PROGRESSIVE" ONE WORLD ORDER!
COME ON PEOPLE, WHEN ARE YOU EVER GOING TO CONCLUDE AND WAKE
UP TO THE FACT THAT THIS COUNTRY HAS NEVER BEEN CONTROLLED BY
THE PEOPLE! IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN CONTROLLED BY THE "SPECIAL
INTERESTS"! WE THE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO BE PAWNS IN THE "SPECIAL
INTERESTS" GAME OF "INTERNATIONAL CHESS"!
"PRAESIS UT PROSIS NE UT IMPERES"
(Lead in order to serve, not in order to rule)