Opelika considers red light cameras
by Elizabeth Fite / STAFF WRITER
Jan 27, 2011 | 2339 views | 2 2 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Opelika city administration is in the process of initiating a legislative act that would allow the installation of red light cameras at dangerous intersections.

Opelika police chief Tommy Mangham said discussion about the cameras started a year ago.

“We’ve talked to the Montgomery Police Department who has this system installed at the present time, and they are quite pleased with it,” Mangham said.

Other than decreasing accidents, Mangham said the traffic cameras allow police officers to clear up confusion that can result from an accident.

Several intersections in Opelika are under consideration for cameras based on Geographic Information Systems data, which reveals the most volatile intersections, Mangham said.

Three intersections with Gateway Drive—Frederick Road, Thomason Drive and Pepperell Parkway—are targets for the cameras. These intersections with Gateway Drive would be the main focus because of the number and severity of accidents that occur as a result of the high volume of traffic in this shopping district.

“Our main objective is not to issue citations—it is to decrease accidents and the severity of them,” Mangham said. “We’re approaching it on a safety issue.”

Mangham said he is optimistic that Opelika will eventually have the cameras since Montgomery was able to pass the legislation.

Montgomery is the only city in Alabama with red light cameras.

Capt. John McCall, commander of the traffic division and red light camera program manager for Montgomery, said he expects many major cities in the state will have the cameras in the next two to three years.

“Most of the people in the town are happy that we have them,” McCall said. “We get very few complaints about them. Most of the calls I get regarding red light cameras are people calling wanting to know if they can get one for their neighborhood.”

From Jan. 1 to Sept. 30, 2007, before the cameras were installed, Montgomery had 7,285 accidents.

After the cameras were installed in April 2008, 6,552 accidents were recorded from Jan. 1 to Sept. 30.

Since the installation of red light cameras, traffic-related fatalities in Montgomery have also decreased from 36 in 2007 to 8 in 2010, McCall said.

McCall said although one to two people per month contest their citations, they have a 100 percent conviction rate.

“If you ask me, ‘Are red light cameras working?’ I’d have to say yes,” McCall said.

David Dorton, director of public affairs for the city of Auburn, said the City Council began discussing the use of traffic cameras in 2003.

However, discussion at the time was thwarted in part by a state law which required police officers to witness a person running a red light to issue a ticket.

“(Assistant City Manager Jim Buston’s) research found that there’s some question as to whether the red light camera actually decreases accidents at intersections, and there’s some evidence that says it increases them,” Dorton said.

“Our statistics don’t show a lot of accidents where running a red light was responsible, and just balancing that with the expense of red light cameras, the assistant city manager’s recommendation a year ago was that we don’t have a compelling reason to install them in Auburn.”

Dorton said the city would revisit the issue if the Council wishes to.

“As much as people hate to see them come into town because of the fear that they may end up getting one of these citations, they’re really a good thing,” McCall said.
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
srd275
|
January 28, 2011
Let me clarify my post:

Where is 2008 and 2009 FATALITY DATA!

www.banthecams.org
srd275
|
January 28, 2011
What is really interesting about Montgomery "safety" claims is WHAT THEY LEFT OUT!

Where are the CONTROL SITES. These are NON camera sites to compare to RLC sites. MISSING!

How many of thoese traffic fatalities are RLV REALATED! And of that how many had DUI, fleeing police, not paying attention, medical mechanical stuff a RLC WILL NOT STOP!

In fact Las Cruces NM attempted to take false "credit" for RLV death that WAS DUI RELATED! http://blog.motorists.org/las-cruces-manipulates-ticket-camera-numbers/

Why no mention of 2008 and 2009 DATA?????? IN fact why we are at it where is 2006 and 2005!

Where is the traffic flow. Many motorists try to avoid these intersections!

YOU NEED TO ASK FOLKS. RLC ARE NOT A SAFETY DEVICE, THEY ARE A REVENUE DEVICE! Most of what they write are techincal FOULS (non dangerous right turns on red, split second mistakes, and stopping over the stop line), not safety ones!

Cities and POLICE have BEEN BUSTED LYING IN 2010.

Examples:

Police claims of safety in LA were found to be MISLEADING by the AUDITOR! http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/32/3277.asp

Chicago, BUSTED LYING on their safety claims.. http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/metro/red-light-cameras-chicago-crashes-accidents-20100607



Winnipeg under reporting. SEE: RED LIGHT CAMERA DISGRACE! http://www.winnipegsun.com/news/columnists/tom_brodbeck/2010/09/22/15445456.html

JOIN THE RLC REVOLT. Citizens in 4 towns in WA STATE are collecing signatures to DEMAND A VOTE! http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/33/3389.asp

www.banthecams.org

www.camerafraud.com

www.bancams.org

www.motorists.org