Letters to the Editor
2 years ago | 1972 views | 9 9 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Student asks what is an ‘imminent threat of violence?’

Editor, The Auburn Plainsman:

After giving Auburn University administrators ample time to inform you of a potentially dangerous situation on campus Monday, March 9, 2009, I have decided to tell you myself.

This letter is intended to:

— Inform the Auburn Family of events that happened on our campus.

— Inform you of the official Auburn University response and their current position on the situation.

At 4 p.m., three young men not registered for the course entered a political science classroom.

They sat at the back of the room and began asking questions and making comments about guns, the war in Iraq, and similar topics.

They were not sitting together but were sitting strategically around the back of the room.

The students were very uncomfortable and afraid. One student left the class.

Another student reported being too afraid to even turn to look at them.

Students were sending text messages back and forth about their odd behavior.

Later, some students were driven home by the police for their own safety.

Two of the three strangers left the room during a break in the class.

Two guys tried to block the third from exiting while banging on the door and making obscene gestures to the class.

The professor tried to stop them, but they fled to a vehicle whose driver was waiting for them outside on the concourse.

The police were called immediately at this point.

Students in the class gave reports of one individual having a black backpack.

The individuals were eventually apprehended at a location off campus.

It was discovered that they were soldiers from Fort Benning who had been drinking at a local bar and came to campus specifically to cause a disruption although their full intentions have not been released by the authorities.

Meanwhile, many of you attended classes in the building or the surrounding area without even knowing this was going on.

I e-mailed Dean of Students Johnny Green to ask what happened in this situation.

I asked why there was no AU ALERT sent, what was the resolution of this instance, and why students were not informed at any point in time?

Dr. Green had an almost indifferent attitude about the whole thing. The official University position is that there were no mistakes made.

Per Dean Green’s response, it can be inferred that this is an occurrence we could expect at anytime.

Just don’t expect any notice, response, or informing process to occur.

AU ALERT will only be used if there is an “imminent threat of violence”.

It is not exactly clear what this means.

This apparently does not include drunk, armed, threatening soldiers entering your classrooms.

Many students feel that Auburn University responded inappropriately.

We have all seen incidents start like this end in tragedy at campuses such as Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois.

Fortunately, the situation did not escalate this time. Hopefully, this letter will serve as a wake-up call that the University cannot keep its students in the dark about issues on their campus.

Hopefully, we can use this as a learning experience to retool a broken system.

Hopefully, the response will be different next time. That is up to you.

We deserve to know what the system is designed to do.

How does AU ALERT work and what can we expect in the future?

Please contact your Dean to seek resolution to this process.

Demand transparency and action from your administration!

Matt Pettit

graduate student,

Public Administration

Comments
(9)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ObamaNoMore
|
April 24, 2009
Please...Same people that thought these guys are suspicious probably think anyone not wearing a polo shirt and New Balances is suspicious too.

If someone is going to come into anywhere to cause harm...they aren't going to make a "show" out of themselves. This sounds like a prank to me.

Speaking of AU Alerts, it's slow as hell and needs to be revised. Tornado warnings get to me after the damn storms are gone.
anonymous
|
April 20, 2009
Wide72 sez the university should be held accountable? What are you talking about? Noting happened except some strangers sat in on a class and made someone uncomfortable. I think one person made a "vomiting sound".
Cecil Atkins
|
April 18, 2009
Maybe this is a new extension of the GI Bill and they were allowed to be there. Maybe there were more there but they were in camouflage. Maybe nobody really cares. Maybe wde72 should cut ties with his adult child and let them grow up without momma/old man smothering them.
wde72
|
April 17, 2009
I posted this on the other Plainsman Article, but I feel it needs to be said here as well.

The University must be held responsible. The article is on point. If the administration at V. Tech had acted quicker they may have been able to save lives. In this day and age it is more important to be safe than sorry. We only know that they were not there to harm people because the Police arrested them a couple hours later. At the time of the incident it was unknown what their intentions were. True it turned out to not be a big deal, but the administration did not know that at the time. The "What If's" are important in this instance and should be considered. Looking back on it there was no need for an AU Alert but the university and the administration did not know that at the time.

As a parent spending thousands of dollars to send my child to this university I want to know they are safe and I should be able to assume that soliders from another state will not be randomly roaming the halls and disrupting their classes.

The proper action would have been to tell students to stay put until we knew what these intruders who were possibly armed were up to. Ensuring student, faculty, staff, and visitors safety should be paramount.
Not Barak Obama
|
April 16, 2009
Wow...DEMAND TRANSPARENCY FROM....

How about this, Matt. Demand TRANSPARENCY from the POTUS first, like he said he'd offer to us, which we haven't seen yet.

And stop being a whiny sissy.

anonymous
|
April 16, 2009
According to Dean Green, the men were UNARMED. The insinuations that they were armed are completely false, and make for a totally different situation, one in which I am far less worried. I believe Dean Green was correct in saying that no mistakes were made. There was no imminent threat of violence, and no need whatsoever to disturb an entire campus full of (hopefully learning) students with an AU alert that could only cause confusion or panic.
not Matt Pettit
|
April 16, 2009
No, there were no weapons that the police found. Because they were soldiers Matt took it upon himself to classify them as dangerous. Also Matt, you can be injured at any moment just by driving your car. Better not drive or someone may hit you, and that is "potentially dangerous," as you so call it. There is no reason for the University to alarm the entire student body for something of that nature. Think you just needed something to write about...
anonymous
|
April 16, 2009
These people were armed? Armed with what? Beer bottles?

not Matt Pettit
|
April 16, 2009
You act like a Freshman, not a graduate student. Get a life.