Introducing a resolution after the public outcry is one way to do it
by Editorial Board
2 years ago | 2591 views | 8 8 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Last week, Auburn City Council member Arthur Dowdell, representative for Ward 1, removed some Confederate flags placed on the graves of Confederate soldiers by the United Daughters of Confederacy in celebration of Confederate Memorial Day, according to the Opelika-Auburn News.

You can’t see it, but we’re all wincing right now.

Come on now, sir.

Regardless of what people think about that flag, and many of us here on staff are not fans of it ourselves, it is wrong to mess with people’s gravesites.

It is understandable you were angered by the display, people have the right to get angry about anything, but the way you handled the situation is not going to recruit people to be sympathetic to your viewpoint.

While wading through the Web comments on the Opelika-Auburn News’ Web site, the comments that ring most true are the ones about government officials believing they are above the law.

As a leader in your community, you should know there are avenues people can take when they have an issue with something on display in a public space, and when you lost your cool, you must have forgotten that.

Your idea to officially standardize decorations allowed in cemeteries is a better move and probably would have been more easily accepted had you not rallied people against you beforehand.

There is a polldaddy.com poll asking the question “Was Auburn city councilman Arthur Dowdell wrong for taking Confederate Flags off of the graves of Confederate soldiers at Pine Hill Cemetery?”

The current results are 97 percent say “yes,” 3 percent say “no.”

Ouch.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
AU_Student
|
May 10, 2009
I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Eubanks and Ms. Ansley.

The Plainsman is usually a very liberal paper, at least by the standards of this town and this University, this kind of remark is usually not published. I'm glad that the editors have taken their readers in mind, but haven't left their own personal views. Its nice to see more competent articles, less bashing of Greek Life, and more than one person writing the entire sports section. A few more variated opinions would be nice.
J D Eubanks
|
May 10, 2009
I think the good Councilman Dowdell is foolish in his approach to rid the South of its history. The flag in question represents thousands of young men dying for what they thought was right. Today, it really should not be used by hate groups or degraded by the Loyal Opposition and it should find it rightful place in the eyes of all citizens. Next year when Black History Month comes around,I hope that the good Councilman Dowdell understands that payback might come and it probably will be ugly. Respect the dead and mind your own business, Mr. Dowdell.
Cecil Atkins
|
May 08, 2009
Geez previous poster, you've proven me wrong. Someone actually did read the Ron Howard article.
CouncilmanDowdell
|
May 07, 2009
It just seems like they are hiding. They usually have a strong opinion on things. They chose their words carefully for this op-ed piece.

C'mon, tell us how you truly feel. They don't seem to mind telling us how they feel about Ron Howard.
Cecil Atkins
|
May 05, 2009
Can some one just post some pics of chicks in rebel flag bikinis? I love that.
anonymous
|
May 05, 2009
In response to the comment below, I believe the "Editorial Board" is comprised of ALL editors at The PlainsMAN, so they all had a hand in writing it.
CouncilmanDowdell
|
May 05, 2009
I think its funny that the "Editorial Board" wrote this and not a single "editor". You guys are jokes at the Plainsmen.
Connie Ansley
|
May 01, 2009
He not only broke laws, trampled on an American citizens civil liberties but also committed a HATE Crime and should be prosecuted. If a member of the White community had done this at a Black cemetery, Federal Marshal would have arrested and placed this person in a Federal prison awaiting trial!!! Hate is hate, no matter who commits it!