A Fear a Day Keeps the Logic Away
by Andrew Sims/Online Editor
12 months ago | 1239 views | 26 26 comments | 18 18 recommendations | email to a friend | print


I think this time it’s noteworthy to talk about the most powerful force on this planet. One that from the beginning of recorded history, I think, we have seen the powers of fear. Fear of new religions, fear of old religions, fear of new people and new ideas, essentially what it narrows down to is a fear of change. We as a species have reacted the same.

We work to snuff out, often to the extreme, that which makes us question the legitimacy of what we have accepted and are comfortable with as concrete. I’m talking about the Crusades, the Inquisition and even the Holocaust.

All of these moments in history have to do with the isolation and slaughter of people who think differently than another group of people.

Edmund Burke wrote some 20 years before the Revolutionary War, “No passion so effectually robs the mind of all its powers and acting and reasoning as fear.”

Recently it’s this health insurance debate that has made the crazies scurry out of the woodwork. Claims of socialism, death committees and illegal immigrants getting free health care are what these “roadblocks to progress” are saying.

I am not saying it is a fantastic idea; personally, I am still educating myself on the facts, comparing them to other countries who run this system. I’m not basing my judgments on the propaganda the very same people who will profit from a private system are feeding me.

Let me get back on track. It is fear that these “town hall” meeting hecklers are spreading. There are thoughts that some of them are even professionals being paid to go from meeting to meeting discouraging discussion and yelling claims of “death panels” and “communism.”

Because we are scared, we are foregoing our brilliant gift of reason.

At what price is this self-induced handicap coming? Not only are we hurting ourselves in the physical sense, since we are talking about health insurance, but are we also prohibiting ourselves as a society from evolving?

Time changes, it’s just what happens. I hear people all the time saying how, “Oh if we would just learn from history, we could avoid all of this.” All of what? Fixing a broken system? I am sorry, but there is nothing conservative about ignorance and a refusal to move. Oh wait, that is exactly what that word means.

Liberal is not a political party, but a mindset that we all should adopt that allows us to remain open minded to anything. The only way we can be more confident in our own beliefs is to know everything about the other side of the argument. If you are scared and running away from it, you have already lost the debate and are useless to your cause.

One of the things that made Hitler so successful at what he did was he controlled peoples’ minds by playing to their individual fears: money, immigrants and religion.

These German people, many of them good people, were tricked into following this man because, I’m going to say it, their mind set was conservative, unwilling to accept change because they were afraid of the instability of questioning themselves and their leaders. Tell me I’m wrong. The result of their fear was the genocide of 6 million European Jews. Will it come to that here?

So, to wrap it up, keep your mind to yourself. It’s all we really have anymore.
comments (26)
« moveon wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 07:11 PM »
wow people are still reading this thing?

don't you people have lives?
« Thomas Dowling wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 03:38 PM »
Wowwwwww, I don't recall anyone forcing you to read Michael's comment. If you want to leave the article then do so, but resorting to name-calling in an attempt to belittle the author reflects poorly on you.
« wowwwwww wrote on Thursday, Sep 24 at 10:06 AM »
wow michael shut the hell up and get over it

this column is 2 weeks old who cares anymore

if the author is stupid then let it be....stop being a little bitch about it
« Michael LaPointe wrote on Wednesday, Sep 23 at 10:33 PM »
Skoallllllllll stated that "Clearly the author is saying that the conservatives use fear to keep the people relying on the government for answers to solve these atrocious and life-threatening problems."

Unfortunately, this is completely backwards. Liberals are all about solving our problems through regulation and government programs (a disastrous idea). Health care reform is an obvious recent example of that. On the other hand, listen to any conservative figure in the media (particularly Limbaugh and Hannity); nearly every day they talk about the government being too large and having too much control over our lives. That is why conservatives so strongly oppose giving the government any more control over health care.
« Mike Gunnells wrote on Wednesday, Sep 16 at 09:28 PM »
"Time changes, it’s just what happens. I hear people all the time saying how, “Oh if we would just learn from history, we could avoid all of this.”

Andrew, if you studied history you would see that nowhere in human history has socialized medicine worked. It always leads to rationing and a decline in quality of care. However, the politicians don't care about that. They just want the power over you, more control of your life.

The best way to 'reform' health care is through tort reform and health savings accounts.
« randald wrote on Tuesday, Sep 08 at 11:21 AM »
the author is clearly playing on fears and ignorance. he assumes the reader knows of hitler and will shudder in a pavlovian way, immediately transfering disgust for nazis to disgust for the writer's target--those who dare dissent in 2009.

the writer goes further, however, and assumes the reader has no knowledge of the crusades or inquisition. any 20th century leftist worth mentioning killed more dissenters on a good afternoon than either the crusades or inquisition in their entirity. perhaps the writer is now attempting to deflect to the fears of that great boogeyman--the church. either way, dissent is still allowed, and the townhallers are only disparaged here because they do not appear to be part of the left's protected list.

and while you are getting that higher education, look up what the 'z' in nazi stood for.

and actually study history

« interesting thought wrote on Sunday, Sep 06 at 08:07 PM »
I agree with your overall idea in your article. Certain people who are truly afraid of President Obama and his policies are building a dangerous tide. It is totally fine to disagree with what the President is doing (millions of people did for the past four years), but the heightened level of this disagreement scares me. I know you never named the President in your article, but that is what it reminded me of as a reader. I think your article was a very interesting thought.

With that being said, I do think that the case of Hitler was a little extreme. I understand where you are coming from and what you are trying to portray, but there were millions of different circumstances as to why Germans followed or complied with what Hitler was doing. I agree with the thought and danger of fear that you are discussing, but I just don't think Hitler's case is a legitimate comparison.

This is just my opinion. Thanks for sharing yours! Keep it up!
« anonymous wrote on Saturday, Sep 05 at 07:48 PM »
Though a noble idea, it's not realistic to expect the paper staff to take the time to have individual discussions with every person who may have an issue with a commentary. That is what the comments are for.

And to the person who suggested that this paper was about liberal/conservative mindsets, even if it were somehow about that it would still fail horribly. What is the conservative mindset here? Is it the scared, quiet citizens of Germany who couldn't muster the courage to question their government? Or is it the outspoken, fear wielding, "road block to progress" conservative mindset that is painted in the beginning of the article. He makes it clear that the liberal mindset is the best, but doesn't feel the need to offer supporting examples. If the German people had a conservative mindset, wouldn't they have been a "roadblock" to Hitler's vast change of Germany into a facist dictator lead nazi war machine?

It's clear that the author has no real definition of the conservative mindset, and adapts it to his needs as a tool to fear the audience with thoughts of genocide, the inquisition and the crusades, into conforming to his "mindset".

« Bifmike wrote on Saturday, Sep 05 at 03:53 PM »
Instead of bashing the author behind a screen I'm sure the staff would allow u to go talk face to face with him... Have a discussion if u are so sure ur right go meet with him...9or just sit behind a computer screen where it's safe where u probe the exact things he said about people
« Adolf wrote on Saturday, Sep 05 at 02:07 PM »
yeah im sorry, the people that followed hitler were for change.. same situation as now.. germany was in a slump, and people wanted answers... and they got them. Im not saying this is a repeat, just the fact that your facts are totally misconstrued..
« Palin wrote on Saturday, Sep 05 at 01:19 PM »
Hecklers? I think not. They are just doing what you are doing by writing this column. Expressing their opinion.

I agree that you should change your major to Geology. The world doesn't need more people like you that call their fellow Americans hecklers because they don't agree with a certain policy. That goes for both sides of any political spectrum.
« @facts wrote on Saturday, Sep 05 at 01:20 AM »
Dude are you stupid?

the column is not even about hitler except the last part and it's only one sentence....dumbass

before you insult someones facts get your READING straight.

DERRRRR
« yikes wrote on Saturday, Sep 05 at 01:08 AM »
People just still are missing it....Mindset people....he said mindset, not political parties.....shit

reading skills people...I'm a republican and some of the rebuttals to this are just pathetic...

one more time, for you idiots who refuse to understand.....liberal and conservative mindset, not political parties....

even though more people will post about hitler not being a conservative....damn
« Facts? wrote on Friday, Sep 04 at 03:26 PM »
I'm all for freedom of speech, but please get your facts straight. As already said, Hitler was a member of the Liberal Socialist Party in Germany. He was about change and NOT about conservativism. He preached CHANGE in all his speeches. He was about government run programs, unions, and big government. That doesn't sound like a conservative at all.
« alum08 wrote on Friday, Sep 04 at 08:04 AM »
I reject that you can maintain your "liberal" mindset by lumping everyone who doesn't want universal health care into the Sarah Palin looney bin. How is that seeing both sides of the argument? Are our views less legitimate because they're not in line with yours?

You have an open forum in which to express something truly profound, and instead you subject us to more of the same bleeding-heart, contradictory dribble. Comparing conservatives to Hitler is fear-mongering in it's own right...plus, he was a National Socialist, by the way, and a huge proponent of CHANGE.

Express your opinion, please. I love America, and that's what we're about. But don't waste our time with this childish nonsense.
« amh0034 wrote on Friday, Sep 04 at 06:39 AM »
I think the main contradiction is that yes it does address the negative effects of fear, and then at the end suggests that 6 million jews could die in America if we listen to the conservatives. That in itself is playing to fear to try and manipulate the reader. And if it was suppose to be an attack on just the negative effects of fear, why does it just mention only conservatives using fear and enlist all Americans to adopt a liberal mindset instead? This is a poorly thought out politically biased piece, end of story. He didnt even do a good job comparing conservatives to nazis.
« GoEagles!!! wrote on Friday, Sep 04 at 12:30 AM »
This is a wonderful article. It is less of an argument against a political affiliation and more of an attack on the negative effects of fear on the individual and on society at large. I also find it interesting that several people on here attacked Liberalism.

Here is a definition of Liberalism: a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.

Apparently the writer of this article has a much more enlightened view of this philosophy than do a number of those that have commented thus far. I am also confused as to why this is incoherent and self-contradictory. Maybe it is because the writer has taken many readers out of his or her comfort zone and challenged preconceived notions while remaining historically accurate. I guess many of these commenter's are just defending his or her fears by attacking the source. Sad isn't it.
« correction wrote on Thursday, Sep 03 at 11:30 PM »
"his is aweful (great name by the way your so funny and clever nobody would have ever thought of that one. o hoho you even spelled it a-w-e thats fun for everyone) ? "

I think he just didn't know how to spell it
« skoallllllllll wrote on Thursday, Sep 03 at 11:24 PM »
hey satnight make the world a better place by wearing a plastic bag hat. Pretty much you are proving what this guy has to say. Geology? what the hell does that mean. wow. republicans must really be retarded they cant even come up with good insults. And for you Wareagle. you should really consider more carefully whether or not taking another breath, ill give you a hint, the answer is no. The point of a COMMENTARY page is allowing people to speak their mind. Something that you conservatives don't like. You like a legalist form of government. Don't know what that is? "Keep the people quiet and stupid." That way they are easy to control and manipulate. Maybe even you want an authoritarian form. Are you people confused again? I guess thats one way to keep the eyes off the failure of a president the we just had. O and lets not forget involving religion. Tyrants have often times made themselves appear to be "divine". Lets just hope "god" will save these people who commented. GOD BLESS AMERICA. Maybe you should open your eyes when talking about grown up things. But keep them closed when you cross the street. Im sorry and pardon my language, but what the f*** is contradictory about this article this is aweful (great name by the way your so funny and clever nobody would have ever thought of that one. o hoho you even spelled it a-w-e thats fun for everyone) ? Clearly the author is saying that the conservatives use fear to keep the people relying on the government for answers to solve these atrocious and life-threatening problems.
« I agree wrote on Thursday, Sep 03 at 10:47 PM »
I agree with the premise of the article that as a nation, we are so afraid of change; we are afraid of "flip-flopping". The point made is that everyone should understand both sides of the argument (a pipe dream, right?). Isn't it ironic that the same people who wanted the government to pull the plug on Terry Shiavo are afraid of "death panels"?

People: get real. Stop listening to the pundits and Palins of the world. For once just stop, think, and make your own decisions and judgements for a change; don't be a bobble-head doll.

And to the Hitler comparison, any of you health-care reform bill dissenters remember the crazy lady that compared the plan to Hitlers. I seem to remember no one on that side of the debate finding that statement very objectionable. Get over it.