Auburn Stands Strong Against West Virginia 41-30
by Nick Van Der Linden / ASSOCIATE SPORTS EDITOR
2 years ago | 1924 views | 7 7 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Auburn vs West Virginia
Auburn players prepare to charge the field after a 63 minute delay due to lightning and heavy rain: Ashlea Draa/ Assistant Photo Editor
view slideshow (48 images)
In a rain-delayed game in which Auburn and West Virginia combined for more than 900 yards of offense, it was the Auburn defense that came up big in Auburn’s 41-30 win Saturday.

The start of the game was delayed by an hour and three minutes because of a lightning storm that made visibility difficult. Despite warnings to leave the stadium because of severe weather, some 15,000 rowdy students decided to stay and cheer.

“I wish I had 87,000 game balls because our fans were a huge reason we won that game, and I want them to know that," head coach Gene Chizik said. "We had thousands of students stay here through that whole thing. Everybody came early, and nobody left because of the weather, and I promise you that was one of the huge reasons we won the game."

West Virginia got off to a quick start, silencing the Auburn faithful, as senior quarterback Jarrett Brown connected with Brad Starks for 58 yards to set up a 1 yard touchdown run.

On the next Mountaineer possession, Noel Devine broke through the middle of the Auburn line and ran 71 yards untouched to the end zone giving the Mountaineers a 14-0 lead with 10:19 left in the first quarter.

Momentum changed as Neiko Thorpe intercepted Brown’s pass at the Auburn 10-yard line. Auburn fought back while Todd threw a 4-yard touchdown pass to wide receiver Darvin Adams. Todd and Adams connected two more times for touchdowns later in the game as Auburn went into the half trailing 21-20.

West Virginia’s drive of the second half was similar to its first two of the game as Devine rushed for 12 yards for a Mountaineer touchdown with 8:51 left in the game.

Tyler Bitancurt missed the extra point making it a one-possession game.

The Tigers responded quickly on their next drive when Mario Fannin took a screen pass for the game-tying touchdown.

The Tigers’ running game was dominant in their first two games of the season, but was held to 100 yards causing the passing game to have a big night.

Todd completed 16 of 31 passes for 284 yards, four touchdowns and one interception.

"We had some really good games running the ball of our last two games, and West Virginia did a lot to take care of that," Todd said. "Because of their rushing pressure, we were able to put the ball in the air and put up some points."

Turnovers hurt the Mountaineers throughout the game as the Auburn defense had a total of five interceptions, the most since 2004 against the University of Tennessee.

“The turnovers were the difference in the game," Chizik said. "There is no question about it."

The Auburn defense gave up a total of 509 yards, but the four interceptions thrown by Brown and Geno Smith in the final period turned the game around for Auburn.

With 3:41 left in the fourth quarter, junior linebacker Craig Stevens intercepted a screen pass and returned it 16 yards for a touchdown to put the game away.

"We had a feeling they were going to run the screen sometime during that series, so I ended up going on a blitz that play," Stevens said. "He lobbed it just enough for me to tip it, and I got it in my hands. Once I got in my hands I had to get in the end zone."

The Tigers (3-0) will play host to Ball State University this Saturday.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
campusgirl
|
September 25, 2009
The writer is from another country and can struggle with common English expressions. The article was written to meet deadline the night of the game at 2 a.m. I know that is no excuse,but everyone needs to chill out. If you don't like the article, stop reading it. It is that simple.
Pablo09
|
September 22, 2009
Responding to the previous comment about my own previous comment: The article has been substantially edited since I responded to it; that's why you don't see the awkward passage about the running game.

I use the term "Third World" with confidence because it was the preferred term among citizens of the Third World country in which I lived and worked--recently. I'll let them know you disapprove.

And as for "the article is not so horrible that you can't read it," that's hardly an acceptable standard for a publication that represents Auburn University.

Grow up. The article stank, and it's juvenile of you to defend it--especially since you haven't read it in its original condition and therefore have no idea what you're talking about. Or maybe you wrote it...
Pablo09 version 2.0
|
September 21, 2009
"running game...were held to 100 yards rushing (missing comma) causing the passing game to have a big night." It were?

This is not in the article.

Now when you say Third World, Mr. Pablo09, what exactly do you mean since the term holds no verifiable meaning in the present? Speaking of using words or phrases colloquially...

I would appreciate if you would just grin and bear it. The article is not so terrible that you can't read it. If you feel that it is, then watch the game or don't read it at all.
record checker
|
September 21, 2009
Daniel Cobb had five touchdowns against La Tech in 2001, still the Auburn record.
copy edited
|
September 20, 2009
was this even copy edited?
Pablo09
|
September 20, 2009
I am a 9th grade composition teacher, a former journalist and the son of an AU journalism alumnus, and I would flunk any student (including those I taught in a Third World context) who submitted anything as egregious as Nick Van Der Linden's account of the West Virginia game. Only my love for Auburn football saw me through a painfully ill-considered monstrosity that reminded me of the semi-literate ramblings of ignorant ex-jock sportscasters who want to sound important. Get over yourself, son, and learn to write a decent sentence. Why tell us that the kicker "would miss" the extra point? Just tell us he missed it--and while you're at it, do away with "would connect" and "would rush." I was especially, ah, impressed with the riveting passage in which we were informed that the AU "running game...were held to 100 yards rushing (missing comma) causing the passing game to have a big night." It were? And do running games no longer specialize in rushing, so that they may be held to 100 yards of something else? And does a weak ground attack guarantee a strong passing game? Gosh, I'll have to tell my colleagues who coach football. I also read with great interest that BOTH Auburn and West Virginia combined for 900 yards of offense instead of just combining with each other in the normal way. With whom did each combine for this impressive total? Van Der Linden's way with words also results in our being informed that the Tigers not only will play Ball State next Saturday, they will "finish the month of September" in that fashion. We never would have figured that out on our own, and it was a great clincher sentence for a brutally incompetent article notably under-equipped with punctuation and over-equipped with the stale colloquialisms of bad sports journalism and kid-speak. But I don't wish to single out Mr. Van Der Linden, who somehow has managed to be named Assistant Sports Editor; surely there is a proofreader somewhere who deserves to retake English 101 with him (assuming he has indeed taken it). This is not the Plainsman I grew up reading, and it is a gift to anyone who wants to perpetuate the jokes about Auburn people being hicks.

copy editor.
|
September 20, 2009
reigns over (please)