Search

A SPIRIT THAT IS NOT AFRAID

Search
Home
Coronavirus
Community
Sports
Campus
Lifestyle
Opinion
Blogs
Video
Photo
Audio
About Us
Classifieds
Advertise

Auburn's News Source

The Auburn Plainsman

Tuesday, August 9, 2022 Print Edition

Send a News Tip
Donate
  • Plainsman's Choice
  • Community
  • Campus
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Video
  • Photo
  • About Us
  • Classifieds
  • Advertise
  • Community
  • Campus
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle
  • Opinion
  • Video
  • Photo
  • Audio
  • Blogs
  • About Us
  • Classifieds
  • Advertise

11/15/2019, 12:50pm

LETTER TO THE EDITOR | 'Homophobic’ professor flubs science, nature, ethics

By Nate Hardy | Associate Professor
LETTER TO THE EDITOR | 'Homophobic’ professor flubs science, nature, ethics
Jennifer Farner | Videographer

Pride on the Plains, a local LGBTQ organization, marches through the annual Opelika Christmas parade on Dec. 2, 2017, in Opelika, Ala.

Share

  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Mail
  • Print

 A couple of weeks ago, AU associate professor Bruce Murray was called out for publicly expressing homophobic views. Since then, Murray has publicly defended his views with appeals to science, nature and ethics. 

In other words, he has tried to justify homophobia with scholarship.

Here’s the thing — his scholarship is poor.

First, science. 

Murray asserts that members of the LGBTQIA community are breaking the laws of biology. Biology is governed by physics, chemistry, chance and history — laws that can’t be broken by anyone. 

What does science tell us about gender? Scientists start with what they can see. Wherever we look, we find a significant minority of people who identify as something other than cisgendered men and women. Scientists then test causal explanations. 

For example, researchers have found that up to one quarter of the variance in sexual orientation — which is just one facet of gender — can be explained by genetics. The upshot is that many of us are born LGBTQIA. Murray’s appeals to science are not based on observation or tests of causation; they’re hooey.


Sign up for our newsletter

Get The Plainsman straight to your inbox.


Next, nature. 

Murray sees non-binary gender as an affront to nature and to natural institutions such as heterosexual marriage. But what is this nature he’s talking about, and is it inherently good? 

Jogging is natural, but so is heart disease. Our ancestors slept on the ground. Is it wrong to sleep on a mattress? 

Murray’s natural-equals-good equation smacks of romantic primitivism — the belief that people are innately good unless they’ve been corrupted by modernity. 

This is the myth of the noble savage. 

It’s a myth. 

Its take on human nature and history is incongruous with decades of research by anthropologists, psychologists, geneticists and neural biologists. Murray’s appeals to nature are just thinly veiled appeals to his own bias.

Finally, ethics. 

Freedom of expression is just one of many freedoms we value in our society. Sometimes one freedom takes away from another. 

In particular, liberty and equality are often antithetical. Someone’s free speech can deprive someone else of equal access to education and economic opportunity. Striking the right balance between liberty and equality is one of the great challenges in building a just society. 

Philosopher John Rawls sees it as an optimization problem in which the goal is to dole out liberty as equally as possible, and promote inequality when it is to the advantage of the least advantaged. 

There is no balancing in Murray’s appeals to ethics; he asserts his liberty to deny LGBTQIA equality.

Murray’s homophobic speech is quantifiably harmful to the LGBTQIA community in that LGBTQIA students are more likely to be bullied in school. 

Is that worth less than Murray’s liberty to publicly pass off his prejudice as scholarship? 

No way. 

Excusing Murray’s hate speech as free speech only affirms that we value LGBTQIA students less than we value straight white men.

Nate Hardy is an associate professor in the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology.

The opinions expressed in columns and letters represent the views and opinions of their individual authors. 

These opinions do not necessarily reflect the Auburn University student body, faculty, administration or Board of Trustees.

Share

Do you like this story? The Plainsman doesn't accept money from tuition or student fees, and we don't charge a subscription fee. But you can donate to support The Plainsman.

Support The Plainsman

Nate Hardy | Associate Professor



Related Stories

Johni Broome dunks in Auburn basketball's second game of its Israel tour against the Israel All-Star team. 

Newcomers, veterans unite in strong showing in Israel

By Lily Stewart | Sports Writer

Soccer vs Kennesaw-10.jpg

Auburn soccer takes 'unfinished business' into new season

By Callie Stanford | Sports Editor

Tj-Finley practing throws during warmups

Auburn quarterback arrested, posts bail

By Destini Ambus | Editor-in-Chief and Callie Stanford | Sports Editor


Share and discuss “LETTER TO THE EDITOR | 'Homophobic’ professor flubs science, nature, ethics” on social media.

 facebook  twitter

Editor's Picks


8/4/2022, 4:24pm

Auburn quarterback arrested, posts bail

By Destini Ambus | Editor-in-Chief and Callie Stanford | Sports Editor

7/1/2022, 4:56pm

Hovey wins GOP nomination after Whatley withdraws from race


7/1/2022, 11:45am

Celebrating the fourth of July around Auburn


6/27/2022, 1:25pm

The Yard Milkshake Bar opens up in downtown Auburn


Virtual Print Edition


Plainsman Podcasts

The Auburn Plainsman To Homepage
  • About
  • Contact
  • Corrections
  • Archives
  • Advertise
  • Letters

All Rights Reserved

© Copyright 2022 The Auburn Plainsman

Powered by Solutions by The State News.