Auburn women better than Playboy
Let's be honest--no one reads Playboy for the articles.
Let's be honest--no one reads Playboy for the articles.
I appreciate your bravery and willingness to write an Op-Ed for the Plainsman, and exercising your freedom of speech and expression of opinion through a media source such as the Plainsman. However, I am deeply offended by your article "Occupy demands echo Obama's politics."
Changes in the Auburn basketball program are coming sooner rather than later.
I sincerely respect the thought of informing the people about today's issues and events; however, the article you published titled "'Occupy' demands echo Obama Politics" was misleading, and the "facts" you obtained about Occupy Wall street were not facts at all, but merely assumption.
I am beyond offended by this article.
Plainsman staff, I usually greatly enjoy the humorous and informative articles in Auburn's esteemed newspaper, but a recent cover story has both disappointed and embarrassed me.
Life is tough for a lot of people. We all had our friends that made our burdens a bit lighter with their company, but we all had our bullies as well. We all knew the people that made our burdens heavier--those that made walking through the doors to school an act of bravery.
It is fine to criticize the Occupy Wall Street movement for its demands.
I sincerely respect the thought of informing the people about today's issues and events, however; the article you published titled " 'Occupy' demands echo Obama Politics" was misleading and the "facts" you obtained about Occupy Wall street were not facts at all, but merely assumption.
I found your recent article by Kelly Tsaltas about breast cancer awareness to be highly offensive.
The landspace of the Iron Bowl has changed.
The fact that you all allowed an editorial to be published about how breast cancer is "overrated" is absolutely pathetic.
I'm sure, or at least I hope, that you have already received many outraged letters concerning a certain writer for The Plainsman.
Does anyone besides me feel that Elizabeth Bonner has it backwards in one way, and wrong in two others, in viewing the Occupy movement as echoing the "louder voice" of President Obama, who she characterizes as "going against" "the rich" and "capitalism", which she, at one point, seems to equate to "social and economic inequality"?
We've been talking a lot in the office lately about capitalism and the freedom to make money.
Harvey Updyke is arguing that an obscure Alabama law prevents authorities from charging him with a felony.
The organic food trend has been going strong since it began nine years ago.
A guest speaker in one of my classes this week said more white people in America like hip-hop than black people. I was shocked.
In the last week, an item of note was brought to my attention: Climategate has been debunked.
The Occupy Wall Street protestors are the echoes of a louder voice we've all heard for the last four years--the voice of President Barack Obama.